The Independent Student Newspaper of St. John's University

The Torch

The Independent Student Newspaper of St. John's University

The Torch

The Independent Student Newspaper of St. John's University

The Torch

View this profile on Instagram

The Torch (@sju_torch) • Instagram photos and videos

Photo Courtesy / Unsplash Solen Feyissa
Op-Ed: Maybe Banning TikTok Isn’t Such a Bad Thing
Elizabeth Kaufmann, Opinion Editor & Human Resources Manager Emerita • April 19, 2024
Photo Courtesy / YouTube Swae Lee
Swae Lee to Headline 2024 Stormin’ Loud
Olivia Seaman, Editor-in-Chief • April 18, 2024
Photo Courtesy / YouTube NPR Music
Chappell Roan: The People’s Pop Princess
Molly Downs, Culture Editor • April 18, 2024

Meghan Markle tells the truth

Oprah’s interview with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex
Photo+Courtesy%2F+YouTube+CBS+This+Morning
Photo Courtesy/ YouTube CBS This Morning

I have always admired the Royal family and wondered what it would be like to be addressed as “Her Royal Highness” and live in Buckingham Palace. I remember watching Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s wedding. It was Saturday, May 19, 2018; I was at work that morning but I tuned into the live feed on my phone because I knew it was a moment I would not want to miss. Markle marrying into the Royal family was so much more exciting for me than when Kate Middleton married Prince William because Markle was the first American to marry into the family; it was like a dream come true. Although, if we are talking about wedding dresses, I did like the Duchess of Cambridge’s lace-detailed gown more. 

In an explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey that aired on CBS on March 7, Markle and Prince Harry revealed the torture the Firm put them through during the past few years. I was surprised to hear that the Palace refused to provide medical care to the Duchess of Sussex when she was having suicidal thoughts. How would having helped someone in need stained the Firm’s reputation? Literally, the only job of the Royal Family is to set an example for the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth by supporting charitable causes and making appearances. They have very little to no political power and are just figure heads – relics of an ancient institution. What kind of example are they setting by ignoring mental health concerns? I have always looked up to the Royal Family for their social work, but refusing medical attention was a selfish act. Expecting Markle to deal with the derogatory tabloid headlines because other Royal Family members had dealt with it was wrong on the Firm’s part. Although, I would assume that the Royal Family has medical staff at the Firm and as a pregnant woman, she would have had to be seeing a physician, so I wonder why she had a difficult time receiving that requested care. 

I do not think Markle is lying about the Firm’s treatment of her. If she wasn’t speaking the truth, I do not think she would have revealed all that she has to the world because it would only end up hurting her more in the end. She has already gotten more than enough attention in the media since her marriage with Prince Harry. In fact, the toxic media attention contributed to her mental distress. The Sussexes also revealed the racist conversations that Royal Family members had with Prince Harry regarding Archie’s skin color. In response to this, Buckingham Palace is considering hiring a Diversity Chief. This move reflects the inadvertent confirmation by the Firm of the Sussexes’ claims, confirming that these alleged conversations took place. 

“The issues raised, particularly that of race, are concerning. While some recollections may vary, they are taken very seriously and will be addressed by the family privately,” the Palace said in a statement to Fox News. What bothers me from this statement is the “some recollections may vary” part. Who would not remember having that conversation about Archie? You either had that conversation or you did not. 

Markle and Prince Harry may not have financial support from the Palace anymore or their status as Senior Royals, but they do have Princess Diana’s endowment and a roughly $20 million inheritance from the Queen Mother. With this large sum of “savings,” I do not see the need for them to complain about their financial situation and emphasize that they have been cut off from Palace finances.

Ultimately it is the Palace’s word over the Sussexes’, but the Sussexes do not have as much to lose — nor much to gain — by airing all of their battles. They were not paid for this interview; they had no incentive to lie. For that reason, I think they are telling the truth. As an institution and figurehead, the Palace is expected to worry more about its reputation. Although I understand this concern of protecting their traditional image in society, they need to be more transparent with their people and keep up with the world around them. Resolving issues behind closed doors, as Prince Albert suggested that the Sussexes do, is not a solid solution in the long run. It clearly hasn’t been doing them any good because problems still persist within the Palace walls and in Royal mindsets. It is a shame that the Palace did not cooperate with Markle and take care of her as they would any blood-related member of the Royal family. I am glad to see them reacting to the situation by hiring a Diversity Chief and acknowledging their flaws to some extent, but I hope they take on a more proactive role in the future and set an appropriate example for people. 

 

View Comments (3)
Donate to The Torch
$0
$500
Contributed
Our Goal

Your donation will support the student journalists of St. John's University. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.

More to Discover
About the Contributor
Priyanka Gera
Priyanka Gera, Managing Editor
Priyanka is a senior Spanish and Environmental Science double major on the pre-medical track. She has been a part of the Torch since her freshman year and has held several positions starting as a Staff Writer, then Assistant Culture Editor, Culture Editor and Digital Editor last year. As a part of the 99th E-Board, her goal is to strengthen the Torch’s online presence and grow the newspaper’s staff and contributors. She hopes to continue writing interesting and important stories for the St. John’s community. A Harry Potter fan, Priyanka is a Slytherin and loves the fourth novel in the series, “Goblet of Fire.” You can reach Priyanka at [email protected].
Donate to The Torch
$0
$500
Contributed
Our Goal

Comments (3)

We love comments and feedback, but we ask that you please be respectful in your responses.
All The Torch Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • A

    amalitaMay 14, 2021 at 3:23 am

    Just to clarify, Meghan was not the first American to marry to the British royal family. It was Wallis Simpson was the first American to marry to the British royal family, marrying King Edward VIII (Queen Elizabeth II’s uncle). He was her third husband and he had to abdicate the throne because the Church of England didn’t approve of their marriage.

    Reply
  • M

    Moya McManusMay 6, 2021 at 11:31 pm

    I disagree that M&H and nothing to gain. It increased their profiles, especially Meghan’s. She is now more famous than Harry. It also “explained” their hasty exit, 18 months following the $40 million state wedding they were given. And continued their ‘victim” narrative that they had “no choice but to leave” and go to LA to make millions monetizing their titles. It also positioned them and their “brand” as anti-racist warriors and spokespersons for those with mental health problems, both hot-button issues of the moment.
    It is unlikely that the palace would refuse to help anyone struggling with suicidal ideation. Harry has openly admitted to undergoing therapy and probably has doctors on speed dial. He, William, and Catherine founded Heads Together in 2016 specifically to draw attention to the issue of depression and suicide and remove the social stigma. Does M want us to believe the palace would have preferred she committed suicide? Obviously, no one can nay-say her claim, but at the time she was supposedly crippled by depression she was guest-editing British Vogue, which she had requested to do, and there are many happy pictures of her and the editor, Edward Enninful, in party hats, etc. celebrating her triumph. She was also working on and promoting her capsule clothes collection for the Smart Works charity and attending the launch. At that time she also engaged the sharp-elbowed Sunshine Sachs, New York PR firm, to handle her publicity in the States and increase her profile there. Not very “royal” behavior. This all occurred when she was 5 months pregnant.
    I believe she threw Harry’s family cynically under the bus. There was no reason to give that interview. They had found their “freedom” back in her hometown, negotiated media deals worth $140 million within weeks of arriving there, and are living in their dream home. What have they to complain about a year after their abrupt exit? If the RF was racist she would not have been welcomed in with a $50 million state wedding.

    Reply
  • N

    NyetekApr 11, 2021 at 9:27 pm

    A huge number of the claims have been debunked already eg false wedding, archies title, not seeing Sam for 20 years, house arrest without passport and keys, etc but okay

    Reply