The Independent Student Newspaper of St. John's University

The Torch

The Independent Student Newspaper of St. John's University

The Torch

The Independent Student Newspaper of St. John's University

The Torch

View this profile on Instagram

The Torch (@sju_torch) • Instagram photos and videos

Torch Photo / Olivia Seaman
The Future is Calling, But Right Now Is Louder
Elizabeth Kaufmann, Opinion Editor Emerita • April 22, 2024
Photo Courtesy / YouTube Taylor Swift
Taylor Swift’s "The Tortured Poets Department" Shoots to Kill
Olivia Rainson, Features Editor & Social Media Manager • April 19, 2024
Photo Courtesy / Unsplash Solen Feyissa
Op-Ed: Maybe Banning TikTok Isn’t Such a Bad Thing
Elizabeth Kaufmann, Opinion Editor & Human Resources Manager Emerita • April 19, 2024

Packing the Court: A Terrible, Terrible Idea

Packing+the+Court%3A+A+Terrible%2C+Terrible+Idea
PHOTO COURTESY/ UNSPLASH ALEJANDRO BARBA

When President Biden announced a commission to examine “the arguments in the contemporary public debate for and against Supreme Court reform,” I initially assumed this was his way of killing the issue. After all, there is no better way to kill an issue than with a committee. But I was wrong; far from killing the issue, he normalized it. An idea once so repugnant that it was immediately dismissed is now receiving attention from the party leader himself. 

This has culminated with a bill entering Congress to expand the Supreme Court; to alter the number of justices for the first time since 1869. Thankfully, this bill won’t pass. It lacks the support of Democratic party leadership and Republicans alike. Unfortunately, this bill accomplishes the unthinkable. 

This bill casts the judiciary as another partisan branch. When Alexander Hamilton and the other Federalists were selling America on the Constitution, they made sure to stress that not only would the judiciary be the feeblest branch of government but an independent one. The naked partisan motive behind this bill is to install four additional justices to “unpack” the court. 

The irony is that Representatives Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and Hank Johnson (D-GA), the bill’s sponsors, would be accomplishing just that. They would politicize the court to the nth degree. Should this bill pass, the court would forever be fair game for political reprisals.  

The founders were abundantly clear that “all possible care is requisite (required) to enable it (the judiciary) to defend itself against their (the other two governmental branches’) attacks” since the judiciary cannot muster money nor men to its cause. All justices can or should do is judge and leave the politicking to accountable parties. 

Should the progressive wing of the Democratic Party succeed, we would see a revolving door of judicial composition as we would expect in a banana republic. Our tit-for-tat politics ensures this. This rubber-stamping judiciary would wreak havoc on our rights, center power in itself and make a mockery of our laws. Justice Stephen Breyer, often referred to as a liberal jurist, agrees that any plan designed to fight the alleged politicization of the court will only feed into that perception. It would tarnish the bench.

As Biden pointed out during his time in the senate, court-packing is not illegal. But it would be a “terrible, terrible idea.” I can say with no doubt in my mind that 1983 Biden hit the nail on the head. Democrats are keen on Hamilton the Musical, but I strongly recommend they read Hamilton, the statesman.

View Comments (1)
Donate to The Torch
$0
$500
Contributed
Our Goal

Your donation will support the student journalists of St. John's University. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.

More to Discover
About the Contributor
Donate to The Torch
$0
$500
Contributed
Our Goal

Comments (1)

We love comments and feedback, but we ask that you please be respectful in your responses.
All The Torch Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • W

    william paul nolanMay 22, 2021 at 6:28 pm

    agreed from an sju attonrey.

    Reply